Date- 27.4.2007
friday
Time- 17:00-20:00
Attendance- All present
Group leader- Vivek Jain
MoM- Luma.S.Kurup
Agenda- A relook at the whole project. Report and presentation formation.
A hectic day it was. Just after our first end term exam today, we were back in action. Enthused we were, as we felt our weeks of hard work is finally fructifying. The countdown for the presentation has begun. We looked at the whole project once again We reviewed the interfaces and architecture diagrams, collated them and started preparing the report. Report got ready by 8 pm. Meanwhile we started working on presentation too. By 10 PM we were ready with the report and presentation.
Friday, April 27, 2007
Minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday (24/05/07)
Time: 9:00pm to 1:00am
Attendance: All Present
Team Leader: Luma s kurup
Minutes: Vivek Jain
Group discussed the various cases that can be tested in the system.
Expected and observed results were discussed for each individual case.
Each group member then created the test plan for his respective module.
Finally all test plans were compiled to form one test plan for the complete system.
Group then discussed the HCI for various modules.\
Different HCI were for each module by respective team members.
One final HCI for the complete project was then created by integrating various HCIs.
Attendance: All Present
Team Leader: Luma s kurup
Minutes: Vivek Jain
Group discussed the various cases that can be tested in the system.
Expected and observed results were discussed for each individual case.
Each group member then created the test plan for his respective module.
Finally all test plans were compiled to form one test plan for the complete system.
Group then discussed the HCI for various modules.\
Different HCI were for each module by respective team members.
One final HCI for the complete project was then created by integrating various HCIs.
Thursday, April 19, 2007
MoM for the 8th meeting held on 19th April
DAY & TIME: 9:00P.M – 11:00 P.M 19.04.2007
ATTENDANCE: All present
GROUP LEADER – SACHIN GUJRATHI
MoM PREPARED BY – RAJEEV JAIN
Agenda: Architecture Diagram
The group discussed the architecture diagrams in today’s meeting. The discussion mainly concentrated on the interactions between the different layers. The group then finalized on the deployment diagram to be made by taking into consideration all the interactions between different subset of the system.
The group also reviewed the class diagram that the group finalized in the previous meeting. The group finally discussed about the HCI to be designed for the project.
ATTENDANCE: All present
GROUP LEADER – SACHIN GUJRATHI
MoM PREPARED BY – RAJEEV JAIN
Agenda: Architecture Diagram
The group discussed the architecture diagrams in today’s meeting. The discussion mainly concentrated on the interactions between the different layers. The group then finalized on the deployment diagram to be made by taking into consideration all the interactions between different subset of the system.
The group also reviewed the class diagram that the group finalized in the previous meeting. The group finally discussed about the HCI to be designed for the project.
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Minutes of the seventh meeting held on 17th April
Time: 9.45 pm to 12 pm
Attendance: All Present
Team Leader: Rajeev Jain
Minutes: Balaraman
Agenda: Class Diagram
The group initially spent some time in understanding "what is a class?" by going through the course ppts and the web in general. Then the classes pertaining to our system were identified.
Then the subgroups dealt with their respective use case diagrams and came up with the class digrams. This was to bring out the asssociate relationship and how classes interact and the visio software was again used for this
Later after collating all the class diagrams attributes and methods pertaining to each class were identified and listed usin visio.
The group decided to meet two days later to discuss about GUI and physical architecture
Attendance: All Present
Team Leader: Rajeev Jain
Minutes: Balaraman
Agenda: Class Diagram
The group initially spent some time in understanding "what is a class?" by going through the course ppts and the web in general. Then the classes pertaining to our system were identified.
Then the subgroups dealt with their respective use case diagrams and came up with the class digrams. This was to bring out the asssociate relationship and how classes interact and the visio software was again used for this
Later after collating all the class diagrams attributes and methods pertaining to each class were identified and listed usin visio.
The group decided to meet two days later to discuss about GUI and physical architecture
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
MoM for the 6th meeting held on 12.04.2007
DAY & TIME: 9:00P.M – 3:30 P.M 10.04.2007
ATTENDANCE: All present
GROUP LEADER – BALARAMAN R
MoM PREPARED BY – VIVEK JAIN
Agenda: Use Case and Activity Diagram
In our Thursday meeting, the group discussed the use case diagrams at both system level and separate module level.
Group also discussed primary actors, stakeholders and normal flow of events for different modules.
We then decided on how to go for activity diagrams for each use case diagram.
Each group within our group then prepared their respective use case and activity diagrams with proper flow of information from one stage to the next.
Group then finally discussed the possible sub flow or extension of already decided placement activities. The group also discussed upon the class diagrams which is to be covered in the next meeting.
ATTENDANCE: All present
GROUP LEADER – BALARAMAN R
MoM PREPARED BY – VIVEK JAIN
Agenda: Use Case and Activity Diagram
In our Thursday meeting, the group discussed the use case diagrams at both system level and separate module level.
Group also discussed primary actors, stakeholders and normal flow of events for different modules.
We then decided on how to go for activity diagrams for each use case diagram.
Each group within our group then prepared their respective use case and activity diagrams with proper flow of information from one stage to the next.
Group then finally discussed the possible sub flow or extension of already decided placement activities. The group also discussed upon the class diagrams which is to be covered in the next meeting.
Sunday, April 8, 2007
MoM of the 5th meeting held on 07.04.2007
SATURDAY 07.04.2007
TIME – 6.30 TO 7.30 PM
GROUP LEADER – VIVEK JAIN
MoM prepared by - LUMA S KURUP
Agenda- Use Case and review the previous work.
The additional module discussed in the previous meeting was included in the Use case diagram. The connection between the actors and the database was explained in the use case diagram. The implementation of scheduling of placement representatives visit for the pre-placement process was incorporated.
The group divided the different modules amongst the team members. Balaraman and Luma worked on web based poll for deciding allotment of the companies and scheduling of companies both day and time.
Sachin and vivek implemented the checking of schedule by every student and the schedule for placement representatives while visiting companies.
Rajeev worked on preplacement and postplacement online training, emailing students about their selection and creation of forums for summer internships feedback and discussion.
The consolidated and the revised document was created after each team members completed their tasks. At the end it was decided that the group will study the activity diagrams,which is the action item for the next meeting.
TIME – 6.30 TO 7.30 PM
GROUP LEADER – VIVEK JAIN
MoM prepared by - LUMA S KURUP
Agenda- Use Case and review the previous work.
The additional module discussed in the previous meeting was included in the Use case diagram. The connection between the actors and the database was explained in the use case diagram. The implementation of scheduling of placement representatives visit for the pre-placement process was incorporated.
The group divided the different modules amongst the team members. Balaraman and Luma worked on web based poll for deciding allotment of the companies and scheduling of companies both day and time.
Sachin and vivek implemented the checking of schedule by every student and the schedule for placement representatives while visiting companies.
Rajeev worked on preplacement and postplacement online training, emailing students about their selection and creation of forums for summer internships feedback and discussion.
The consolidated and the revised document was created after each team members completed their tasks. At the end it was decided that the group will study the activity diagrams,which is the action item for the next meeting.
Saturday, April 7, 2007
Minutes of the fourth meeting held on Wednesday (04-04-07)
Time: 9 pm to 12 pm
Attendance: All Present
Team Leader: Sachin Gujrathi
Minutes: Rajeev Jain
Agenda: Function Point analysis and Feasibility analysis
Meeting was started reviewing the initial scheduling steps prepared during the Sunday meeting. The steps were analyzed and discussed once more to get everyone on same thinking track.
Later Sachin and Rajeev explained what steps have to be identified (i.e. explaining how software will interact with database for getting data and then the GUI will get info from user). This was done so as to identify various interactions that would take place in each step of scheduling.
After this initial explanation, various steps for scheduling were internally divided among us and every member started identifying the interactions involved in each step. Once this was done, the group as a whole classified the various interactions for function point analysis and then the lines of code and man-hours were calculated.
Once this was done, with the interactions being already identified, we were able to do operational and economic feasibility. Vivek and Luma worked on economic cost part, listing the various software and hardware required and finding the relevant price from the internet. Balaraman worked on operational feasibility simultaneously.
Sachin and Rajeev documented the function point analysis done.
Group wound up with finalizing the ppt for presentation of feasibility and function point analysis.
Attendance: All Present
Team Leader: Sachin Gujrathi
Minutes: Rajeev Jain
Agenda: Function Point analysis and Feasibility analysis
Meeting was started reviewing the initial scheduling steps prepared during the Sunday meeting. The steps were analyzed and discussed once more to get everyone on same thinking track.
Later Sachin and Rajeev explained what steps have to be identified (i.e. explaining how software will interact with database for getting data and then the GUI will get info from user). This was done so as to identify various interactions that would take place in each step of scheduling.
After this initial explanation, various steps for scheduling were internally divided among us and every member started identifying the interactions involved in each step. Once this was done, the group as a whole classified the various interactions for function point analysis and then the lines of code and man-hours were calculated.
Once this was done, with the interactions being already identified, we were able to do operational and economic feasibility. Vivek and Luma worked on economic cost part, listing the various software and hardware required and finding the relevant price from the internet. Balaraman worked on operational feasibility simultaneously.
Sachin and Rajeev documented the function point analysis done.
Group wound up with finalizing the ppt for presentation of feasibility and function point analysis.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)